You guys are literally insane like wow okay Btw I know both of you in real life and you aren't really who you say you are Have a good day

Anonymous

Dear Anon:
I’m sorry you dislike us that much. I don’t know if you actually do know us IRL, but your accusation that we aren’t who we say we are is ludicrous. We’re pretty upfront people.
Best wishes!
LUE

politicalpasta:

We have an Administration that purposely distracts Americans from Obamacare, Debt, Unemployment, Gas Prices, Savings Accts, etc, etc, and these numskills are aiding and abetting…falling for their trick everytime.
Our house in on fire, and these Republicans are helping Democrats set up speed bumps for the Firemen (the other Republicans). 
It is bordering criminal activity.

politicalpasta:

We have an Administration that purposely distracts Americans from Obamacare, Debt, Unemployment, Gas Prices, Savings Accts, etc, etc, and these numskills are aiding and abetting…falling for their trick everytime.

Our house in on fire, and these Republicans are helping Democrats set up speed bumps for the Firemen (the other Republicans).

It is bordering criminal activity.

(via teenconservatarian-deactivated2)

Posted on Thursday, April 11, 2013 at 8:33.53 pm
123 notes
Source: http://instaconservative.tumblr.com/post/47739064584/primetime-post-today-the-republicans-disappoint
therealashleydionne:

Know your rights.


If you people didn’t know these I’m judging you.

therealashleydionne:

Know your rights.


If you people didn’t know these I’m judging you.

(via entropic-dissonance-deactivated)

Posted on Monday, April 8, 2013 at 8:09.42 pm
589 notes
Source: http://dawnmarie420.tumblr.com/post/47253613349/they-dont-teach-this-in-school-any-more
new-age-conservative:

There three people who were primarily responsible for the destruction of Communism in the West. Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher,and  John Paul II.  The last of them, Baroness Thatcher, passed away today.  

new-age-conservative:

There three people who were primarily responsible for the destruction of Communism in the West. Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher,and  John Paul II.  The last of them, Baroness Thatcher, passed away today.  

(via i-thought-you-were-special-deac)

Posted on Monday, April 8, 2013 at 7:57.45 pm
117 notes
Source: http://new-age-conservative.tumblr.com/post/47466504224/these-three-people-who-were-primarily-responsible
freedomtomarry:

Today, Republican Senator Mark Kirk announced support for the freedom to marry, making him the 50th Senator to support marriage for same-sex couples! Reblog this quote to thank him for raising his voice. http://bit.ly/12cy7EK

freedomtomarry:

Today, Republican Senator Mark Kirk announced support for the freedom to marry, making him the 50th Senator to support marriage for same-sex couples! Reblog this quote to thank him for raising his voice. http://bit.ly/12cy7EK

Posted on Tuesday, April 2, 2013 at 3:58.18 pm
153 notes
Source: http://freedomtomarry.tumblr.com/post/46945830012/today-republican-senator-mark-kirk-announced

I have never liked my Representative, Mike Pompeo, but now I really don’t like him. He voted yes for HR 993, which includes a provision that eliminates the federal court system’s ability to stop companies from growing GMFs (genetically modified foods), even if they are hazardous to our health. Check here (http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=1&vote=00044) to see if your Senator voted for the bill and here (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2013/roll062.xml) to see if your Rep did.
~LUE

(via southern-conservatism)

Posted on Monday, March 25, 2013 at 8:01.31 pm
215 notes
Source: http://www.tumblr.com/blog/private_36866543?46294657653
rightsideofpolitics:

ragingcommonsense:

the-breadgunner:

moochiethinks:

popchartlab:

Stop Gun Violence.

OK, waitaminite.
The shooting in Connecticut was a HORRIFIC event. I have been ill to my stomach since finding out about it. I am emotionally disturbed by the images I’ve seen online. Like the rest of you, I am I can not imagine what would cause this.
I am not a gun owner. I don’t believe I ever will be.
But … before we go blaming guns, let’s look at actual, real fact here. The statistics in this graphic are correct, I assume, though they are incomplete. I’m not disputing their correctness. I am disputing the intent of those who created this graphic & the fact that it implies, which is that the USA is a far more murderous nation than any other simply because of the fact that we can personally own guns.
I Googled the 2011 population of each of these nations and divided it by the numbers of murders by gun given in the graphic. Below are the percentages, per capita, of murders by gun for each nation:
Finland: 0003%
Austrailia: 0002%
England: 00007%
Spain: 0001%
Germany: 0002%
Canada: 0005%
And …
USA: 003%
Yes, the USA has more deaths by gun, per capita, than all these other industrialized nations. But the difference is in the thousandths of a percentage point. Statistically, the USA simply does not experience a significantly greater number of murders by gun than these other nations. At all. Why? Because our population is significantly greater than all these other nations.
See what knowing the facts, actual empirical evidence, does? Kinda changes the way you look at this graphic, doesn’t it? Well, it should. And, IMO, it should anger you.
Why? This graphic is woefully incomplete because it does not provide the year, or years, each of these statistics of murder by gun were taken from. This graphic exists solely for the purposes of creating support for anti-gun legislation by engendering an emotional reaction in individuals who are, because they have seen images & read reports of a horrific incident that only just occurred today, predisposed to feel that emotional response. That is all this graphic is for. Manipulation.
This graphic is emotionally manipulative. Period. Full stop. It was created to take advantage of people who have been affected by the Connecticut shooting. It is ignorant of actual, real fact (in fact, it actively ignores the bigger picture of the issue) & desires that we all be ignorant of actual, real fact.
I find it repugnant. And such graphics do NOTHING to help anyone at this time, when such a tragedy is so fresh for us.
If those who created this graphic are interested in having a rational discussion about guns, let’s do that. By all means. It is a discussion that should be had in all the nations listed above on an ongoing basis. But, please, do not insult my intelligence & take advantage of me emotionally to make your political point. It serves no one.
No one. Especially the victims of this horrible shooting.
Especially in a time like this when we’re all affected by such a tragic & horrific event. Those who created this graphic are using the deaths of 28 people, 20 of whom were children (as of this writing), for their personal political agenda.
Knock it off.

Thank.

THIS IS WHAT I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO TELL PEOPLE.
BUT NOOOOOO.

Please watch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ko0WgNjONIA&feature=youtube_gdata_player


The Brady Campaign is racist. 

rightsideofpolitics:

ragingcommonsense:

the-breadgunner:

moochiethinks:

popchartlab:

Stop Gun Violence.

OK, waitaminite.

The shooting in Connecticut was a HORRIFIC event. I have been ill to my stomach since finding out about it. I am emotionally disturbed by the images I’ve seen online. Like the rest of you, I am I can not imagine what would cause this.

I am not a gun owner. I don’t believe I ever will be.

But … before we go blaming guns, let’s look at actual, real fact here. The statistics in this graphic are correct, I assume, though they are incomplete. I’m not disputing their correctness. I am disputing the intent of those who created this graphic & the fact that it implies, which is that the USA is a far more murderous nation than any other simply because of the fact that we can personally own guns.

I Googled the 2011 population of each of these nations and divided it by the numbers of murders by gun given in the graphic. Below are the percentages, per capita, of murders by gun for each nation:

Finland: 0003%

Austrailia: 0002%

England: 00007%

Spain: 0001%

Germany: 0002%

Canada: 0005%

And …

USA: 003%

Yes, the USA has more deaths by gun, per capita, than all these other industrialized nations. But the difference is in the thousandths of a percentage point. Statistically, the USA simply does not experience a significantly greater number of murders by gun than these other nations. At all. Why? Because our population is significantly greater than all these other nations.

See what knowing the facts, actual empirical evidence, does? Kinda changes the way you look at this graphic, doesn’t it? Well, it should. And, IMO, it should anger you.

Why? This graphic is woefully incomplete because it does not provide the year, or years, each of these statistics of murder by gun were taken from. This graphic exists solely for the purposes of creating support for anti-gun legislation by engendering an emotional reaction in individuals who are, because they have seen images & read reports of a horrific incident that only just occurred today, predisposed to feel that emotional response. That is all this graphic is for. Manipulation.

This graphic is emotionally manipulative. Period. Full stop. It was created to take advantage of people who have been affected by the Connecticut shooting. It is ignorant of actual, real fact (in fact, it actively ignores the bigger picture of the issue) & desires that we all be ignorant of actual, real fact.

I find it repugnant. And such graphics do NOTHING to help anyone at this time, when such a tragedy is so fresh for us.

If those who created this graphic are interested in having a rational discussion about guns, let’s do that. By all means. It is a discussion that should be had in all the nations listed above on an ongoing basis. But, please, do not insult my intelligence & take advantage of me emotionally to make your political point. It serves no one.

No one. Especially the victims of this horrible shooting.

Especially in a time like this when we’re all affected by such a tragic & horrific event. Those who created this graphic are using the deaths of 28 people, 20 of whom were children (as of this writing), for their personal political agenda.

Knock it off.

Thank.

THIS IS WHAT I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO TELL PEOPLE.

BUT NOOOOOO.

Please watch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ko0WgNjONIA&feature=youtube_gdata_player

The Brady Campaign is racist. 

(via c0ldchills-deactivated20130924)

Posted on Sunday, March 24, 2013 at 9:20.34 pm
576 notes
Source: http://popchartlab.tumblr.com/post/37926496484/stop-gun-violence
"I prefer liberty with danger than peace with slavery."

Jean-Jacques Rousseau (via thinksquad)

says the wannabe dictator statist that thinks people should bow down to the collective… okay then. 

(via the-liberty-republican)

That’s not what Rousseau thought.

(via the-liberty-republican)

Posted on Saturday, March 23, 2013 at 11:13.04 pm
82 notes
Source: http://thinksquad.tumblr.com/post/46129493893/i-prefer-liberty-with-danger-than-peace-with
choosechoice:

boughtbyblood07:

This is the PDF of Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky and I swear choosechoice is blind as hell because its on the 5th page RIGHT AFTER the pages she/he gave me. IT’S RIGHT THERE! HOW THE HELL CAN YOU MISS IT!?
http://servv89pn0aj.sn.sourcedns.com/~gbpprorg/obama/Rules_for_Radicals.pdf

Firstly, that’s not a dedication page- that’s an introduction. And it references Dante’s Lucifer as the first radical. That’s it. That’s the fucking context.
Are you incapable of actually understanding parts of a book?
(Also, fun fact- I am actually blind as hell. Not completely, but pretty damned close.)

And how exactly do you get that from this quote?

choosechoice:

boughtbyblood07:

This is the PDF of Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky and I swear choosechoice is blind as hell because its on the 5th page RIGHT AFTER the pages she/he gave me. IT’S RIGHT THERE! HOW THE HELL CAN YOU MISS IT!?

http://servv89pn0aj.sn.sourcedns.com/~gbpprorg/obama/Rules_for_Radicals.pdf

Firstly, that’s not a dedication page- that’s an introduction. And it references Dante’s Lucifer as the first radical. That’s it. That’s the fucking context.

Are you incapable of actually understanding parts of a book?

(Also, fun fact- I am actually blind as hell. Not completely, but pretty damned close.)

And how exactly do you get that from this quote?

(via choosechoice-deactivated2014081)